There’s a meme running through conscious communities right now that must be called out directly.
It goes like this: She has trauma. Or: Look at everything she’s done for this movement. And somehow, those two sentences become a full accounting ~ a ledger that cancels out whatever harm came after. The person who was harmed is left standing there holding a debt that was never acknowledged, and the community moves on.
I’ve been on the receiving end of this. More than once.
A few years back, a couple we had agreed to purchase land with turned out to be something other than what we’d been told. When things fell apart ~ badly ~ they didn’t just walk away. They slandered us. Specifically, deliberately, and to people whose opinions carried weight in the community we depended on for work. One of those people, someone with real standing in the permaculture world, took their word for it without a conversation. And then repeated it.
The financial fallout was not abstract. We’re talking poverty. We’re talking years of clawing back toward something resembling stable ground, while the person who spread those stories moved through the same community with her reputation entirely intact.
Here is what most people don’t think about when they hear the word slander: it doesn’t just cost you money. It costs you belonging. When your reputation is damaged in the community that is also your professional ecosystem ~ the people you’d turn to for work, for collaboration, for a referral, for the kind of quiet trust that makes a small community function ~ you lose something that has no line item. You become a person others are uncertain about. Opportunities don’t disappear dramatically. They just quietly stop arriving. You watch people you respect make decisions about you based on information that was never true, and you have no clean way to correct it because doing so requires talking about it, and talking about it sounds defensive, and sounding defensive confirms what they already half-believe. It is a trap with no obvious exit.
For a while, the only work available to us came from people either outside that sphere entirely or who had known us long enough to know the story was wrong. That is a very small pool. We lived in it for years.
When I spoke directly to the person who had spread the stories ~ told her what had actually been said versus what she had been told I said ~ she responded with: Thanks, I’m glad you didn’t say that about me.
That was it. No correction of the record. No acknowledgment of what her words had cost us. Nothing that resembled accountability. Just relief that her own image was intact.
I’ve thought about that exchange a lot. Because what she demonstrated in that moment wasn’t just a personal failure ~ it was a pattern I see everywhere in communities that consider themselves conscious, evolved, aware.
We have confused not being malicious with making things right.
They are not the same thing.
When slander costs someone their livelihood, an apology ~ even a sincere one ~ doesn’t restore what was lost. Accountability has a second step that most people skip entirely: balancing the harm. Going back to the people you told. Correcting what you said. Actively restoring what your words dismantled. That’s not punitive. That’s just how equilibrium actually works. You take something out of balance, you have a responsibility to bring it back.
The trauma meme makes this worse. Somewhere along the way, we collectively decided that perceiving why someone behaves destructively is the same as excusing it. It isn’t. Every single person walking around in this era has experienced significant disruption to their nervous system ~ loss, displacement, economic instability, relational fracture. That’s not an exception anymore. That’s the baseline. Trauma doesn’t disappear as a reality. But it also doesn’t disappear as a personal responsibility. We make choices every day about what we do with what we carry.
And the good works meme is equally corrosive. Contribution to a cause ~ even real, significant contribution ~ does not generate a credit account that can be drawn on when you harm someone. That’s not how it works. Decades of good work in permaculture or any other field do not purchase the right to bully someone at a community event, or to spread unverified information about them, or to simply never correct the damage you caused because it would be uncomfortable.
What I’ve observed, over years of working in communities built around values of sovereignty and right relationship, is that these exemptions tend to flow toward people with social capital. The person with the reputation, the credentials, the long history ~ she gets the benefit of the doubt. The person without that standing ~ she gets to absorb the consequences of someone else’s careless words and keep it moving.
That’s not a community operating by its stated values. That’s a hierarchy with better branding.
I’m not interested in performing forgiveness I haven’t arrived at. I’m also not interested in staying angry in a way that costs me more than it costs anyone else. What I am interested in is naming the pattern clearly, because I don’t think my experience is unusual. I think a lot of people are quietly carrying damage that was never acknowledged, in communities that pride themselves on being different.
We can do better than this. Not by being perfect ~ but by being honest about what accountability actually requires when we get it wrong.
The scales don’t balance themselves.
If you’d like to share this piece, please link to it rather than reposting the full text. Linking helps others find the work in its original context and allows it to continue.
Thank you for reading and sharing with care.
If this work resonates with you, consider supporting it with a donation.
Your support helps keep this work going and accessible.
